Epstein Files Released By Department Of Justice
on Dec 19, 2025
Files Released After Receiving Near-Unanimous Vote By House And Senate, And Trump’s Signature
President Donald Trump and his Department of Justice have complied with a law seeking to make publicly available many documents concerning Epstein, with the files being released today, Dec. 19.
Since the death in federal prison of Jeffrey Epstein in 2019, the public has been interested in the truth regarding the well-connected convicted sex offender and his affiliates.
Rumors have circulated on both sides of the aisle regarding how, or why, Epstein died, and who may have had the most to gain from Epstein not being around to disclose information to authorities.
In the time since Epstein’s death, many individuals associated with him have fallen from grace, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; and former Harvard University President Lawrence H. Summers.
Further, former President Bill Clinton has been subpoenaed to speak to the House of Representatives’ Oversight Committee, but failed to show up for his October deposition. Both he and former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton were rescheduled to give their depositions on December 17 and December 18, respectively, but that never materialized.
However, the big question concerns Trump, who was once a friend of Epstein and was serving his first term as president when Epstein was arrested in 2019 and died…
Is the sitting president implicated in the files?
When Elon Musk made his exit from service as a Special Government Employee overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, the tech billionaire famously claimed that Trump “is in the Epstein files,” adding, “That is the real reason they have not been made public.”
But what do the files released in the latest batch on Epstein contain?
About The Epstein Files Transparency Act
While the existence, or lack thereof, of a “client list” drew widespread attention in July when Attorney General Pam Bondi denied its existence after stating in February on Fox News that the list was “on her desk,” that attention translated to action in Congress.
Initially proposed by Rep. Ro Khanna, D-CA, one week after the fallout from Bondi’s denial of a client list existing, the Epstein Files Transparency Act didn’t gain much traction until it procured a Republican ally.
After the longest government shutdown in American history ended on day-43, on November 12, members of the House of Representatives came together in support of a push for the bill to move forward which was instigated by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY.
The bill ensures that “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” in the Department of Justice’s possession which pertain to the investigation and prosecution of Epstein would be released.
Notably, this includes materials pertaining to Epstein’s closest associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for sex trafficking.
Other documents included in this bill are flight logs, travel records, and “individuals named or referenced (including government officials) in connection with the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.”
Ultimately, the House voted 427-1 on November 18, and it proceeded to the Senate, where it was approved unanimously the very next day.
On November 19, Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act into law, giving the Department of Justice 30 days to prepare the digital release of all applicable documents pertaining to Epstein.
Anything which is not included, such as victim identities, must be summarized to Congress in accordance with this law.
RELATED: Dan Bongino Announces Resignation As No. 2 In The FBI
What We Know So Far, And Where To View The Files
Trump has said, as recently as November 17, that he has “nothing to do with Epstein.”
His past friendship and association with Epstein has drawn significant criticism and scrutiny.
Still, for Trump, the release of these files is in keeping with a push for transparency on a variety of events which have led to, in some cases, decades of conspiracy theories.
Namely, the release of all files pertaining to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were significant, but yielded little to no new knowledge.
Similarly, all files regarding the famed aviator Amelia Earhart, who disappeared with her navigator Fred Noonan, were also released this year.
Of the Epstein files, Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche told Fox News on Dec. 19, “I expect that we’re going to release several hundred thousand documents today, and those documents will come in all different forms — photographs and other materials associated with all of the investigations into, into Mr. Epstein.”
Continuing, he said, “I expect that we’re going to release more documents over the next couple of weeks … So today, several hundred thousand, and then, over the next couple of weeks, I expect several hundred thousand more.”
Now, the first batch of files is available, with documents organized as follows:
- Court Records;
- DOJ Disclosures, Including Disclosures Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act;
- Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); and
- House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Disclosures.
While the release of the files has, possibly, hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, NBC News reports that the first batch is “3,500 files, totaling more than 2.5 gigabytes of photos and documents.”
To view the Justice Department’s batch of newly released files, visit its website, here.
Critical Responses To The Release Of The Files
Shortly following the release of the batch of files made available on Dec. 19, there have been many who have noted a preponderance of redacted documents included within the files.
For the two key figures behind the Epstein Files Transparency Act — Rep. Ro Khanna, D-CA and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY — this poses an issue.
In a video statement, Khanna took the Department of Justice to task.
“They released one document from a New York grand jury of 119 pages, totally blacked out,” said Khanna, noting a judge required the release of the document. “The law requires them to explain redactions, there’s not a single explanation.”
View the redacted 119-page document, here.
He went on to point to Attorney Gen. Pam Bondi, saying, “The reality is Pam Bondi has obfuscated for months. She first said there were no more documents to be seen, now she’s admitting and releasing hundreds of thousands of documents, but it is an incomplete release with too many redactions.”
The DOJ’s document dump of hundreds of thousands of pages failed to comply with the law authored by @RepThomasMassie and me.
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) December 19, 2025
One document, 119 pages of Grand Jury testimony, was completely redacted.
I explain what is missing and what the survivors and their lawyers are still… pic.twitter.com/Wg1xFIM2vE
Khanna went on to say that he and Massie are looking to hold officials responsible for the release of the files, with impeachment being an option on the table.
Massie’s remarks can be seen, here:
Unfortunately, today’s document release by @AGPamBondi and @DAGToddBlanche grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law that @realDonaldTrump signed just 30 days ago. @RepRoKhanna is correct. https://t.co/gZQyQBUT4R
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) December 19, 2025
This is a developing story.
